Tips for structuring a successful device pilot

One of the most common mistakes hospital systems make when implementing a mobile device strategy is choosing the wrong devices. Problems like devices not roaming well from access point to access point, or even simple manufacturer quality issues, can sabotage a strategy’s success.

It’s easy to assume that if a device costs upward of a thousand dollars it would meet almost any need a clinician could have, but many hospitals have found out the hard — and expensive — way that a high-dollar price tag doesn’t guarantee the best device for their user groups.

The best way to avoid this risk is to pilot any device before making a big purchase.

The importance of end-user input

The most important thing to keep in mind when piloting a new device is to conduct the pilot in real-world situations. There is a greater chance of a successful pilot if the devices are put right into the hands of end users and are used throughout the day within normal workflows.

Most end-user groups in hospital settings are very mobile by the nature of their jobs. Clinicians must be in many different places throughout the facility at many different times of day. And it’s necessary to make sure their devices roam effectively throughout your facility, without falling off the network.

For example, be sure to test the user experience at somebody’s desk, in a patient room, and in common areas of the hospital such as hallways, cafeterias and conference rooms. Don’t forget about areas outside the hospital, if personal devices are going to be included in your strategy.

Also, have a variety of end-user groups — e.g., nurses, ER directors, residents — test the devices. Apply as many variations as possible to the pilot process to increase the probability of finding a deal-breaking oddity. This will help you avoid purchasing and deploying expensive devices that aren’t going to work well within your hospital’s workflows.

Consider maintenance needs along with functionality

When it comes to workflows, test the devices against IT’s own needs. Think about the IT team’s ability to maintain the agreed-upon devices and policies, as well as manage them. The devices and the device strategy need to work just as well for IT as they do for the end user.

Another critical but sometimes overlooked element of the pilot experience is to test installation of commonly used applications. The goal here is to avoid any showstopping surprises after the devices are purchased and in the hands of hundreds, maybe even thousands, of end users. There are application limitations that are common to certain operating platforms, and if these limits are not tested before a device is selected and purchased, a breakdown in workflows and strategy adoption is likely.

For example, there’s a common assumption that by purchasing an Android device, end users will be able to run any app from the Google Play Store. The reality, though, is that some of these devices are on old versions of Android — i.e., 4.9 or lower — or they are heavily modified versions of Android that don’t support the Play Store or don’t support Google Cloud Messaging.

Since Google Cloud Messaging is used for push notifications, that’s the default push notification mechanism. If devices don’t support this feature, then extra work will be required.

You want to be as informed as possible about what you’re buying and how it’s going to work in real-life scenarios within—and beyond—your hospital walls.

 

 

Higher MIPS scores and positive CMS adjustments

Technology helps us do so much more than we used to be able to do on our own. If there’s anything we’ve learned in the last decade of technological innovation it’s that “there’s an app for that” when it comes to just about any goal you want to accomplish.

This absolutely includes the financial goals you’ve set for your practice, which you’ve probably had to re-evaluate recently due to the uncertainty surrounding CMS payment adjustments under MACRA.

Healthcare IT (HIT) will play a major role in your MACRA compliance efforts. In addition to automating some of the more tedious processes the new regulations require, HIT can help physicians score high under the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), which is necessary to receive positive payment adjustments from CMS beginning in 2019.

Here’s how HIT, especially tools that enables efficient and timely care team collaboration, can boost scores in each of the four weighted MIPS performance categories:

Cost

The processes and treatment plans used by clinicians to deliver patient care are directly tied to costs. In the face of potentially negative payment adjustments, it’s more important than ever to realize cost savings, a feat that will be heavily impacted by providers’ ability to manage chronically ill populations. Success in population health management is highly dependent upon efficient communication, collaboration and care coordination across all care team members and care settings. Communication workflows and unified communication tools need to be assessed and implemented to improve the speed and efficiency with which disparate care team members can communicate with each other to coordinate care.

Quality

Clinicians have a lot of personal freedom when it comes to the quality of the care they deliver. One of the more manageable ways to improve the quality of healthcare is to overcome communication obstacles that have long degraded and delayed care. Obstacles such as not knowing who to contact for a given situation; searching for and struggling to find contact information and leaving messages with intermediaries; never knowing if the right message will be delivered to the right recipient, thus suspending and disrupting care, etc., are easily overcome with the help of intelligent communication routing and automatic escalation tools.

Advancing Care Information (ACI)

EHR functionality is a key component of ACI, but an EHR’s capabilities to support care coordination are limited. Care team members in a physician’s network may or may not share the same EHR, and the need to seamlessly communicate with them — and those outside of the network who are even less likely to have the same EHR — is equally important. There’s an increased need to implement a system of secure communications that transcend disparate EHRs to ensure timely bilateral exchange of patient information. Interoperability is an important factor for the ACI performance score.

Improvement Activities

Clinicians who utilize patient-centered approaches to achieve better, smarter and healthier care will perform well in this category. Implementing tools that enable patient-centric communications is one step toward achieving a high score in the Improvement Activities performance category.

More than 600,000 clinicians will be responsible for reporting MIPS performance criteria for at least 90 days this year. MIPS reporting is complicated, complex and extremely important to understand because it will impact CMS payment adjustments beginning in 2019.

The threshold to receive a positive payment adjustment has been set very low for 2017, so there’s less financial risk for eligible clinicians in the first year. The clinicians who want to cross the low composite score threshold to receive the maximum positive adjustment possible in 2019 need to score high in the performance measurement areas of Quality, Advancing Care Information and Improvement Activities. Reporting in the Cost category will begin in 2018.

Care team collaboration and communication platforms like PerfectServe® help clinicians decrease costs and improve quality by eliminating inefficient and time-consuming communication processes that delay treatment. Our cloud-based architecture allows clinicians to transcend the communication capabilities of the EHR and securely coordinate care with disparate interdisciplinary providers regardless of their location; and the patient-centered communication capabilities neatly fulfills all of the criteria for the Improvement Activities performance category.

Managing the surprisingly troublesome impact of real-time healthcare on clinical decision-making

We live in an age of instant gratification. From the texts we send friends and family to the orders we place on Amazon.com, we’ve come to expect immediate results: instant responses, next-day shipping, etc.

The idea of immediacy in healthcare communications is not new. In fact, in 2015, healthcare analyst Gartner outlined a vision for what it dubbed the “real-time health system”—a landscape where healthcare professionals will be constantly aware of what’s happening within their systems and with their patients.

As a person living in the digital age, you’ve probably experienced real-time awareness in other parts of your life: the repetitive dings of received text messages, the intermittent beeps of calendar alerts, the near-constant hum as your smartphone vibrates over and over to let you know your mother, children and cousins have uploaded photos to Facebook, Instagram and Snapchat. In fact, as I’m typing this piece, I’ve heard alerts for two personal text messages that I’ve yet to look at (the temptation is maddening), four work-related emails (that I did have to stop and look at), a notification that someone commented on a thread I replied to on Facebook and more.

While there’s definitely a benefit to each of us knowing what’s happening in our expanded universe in real time—and we can easily draw a direct line to the benefits that doctors, nurses and patients would experience if they could communicate instantaneously while coordinating care—the influx of information is simply overwhelming.

And when alarm fatigue sets in, important messages get missed, the communication cycle breaks down and what was once a valuable resource becomes a liability. Overwhelmed and inundated clinicians cannot optimally use their invaluable expertise to make effective clinical decisions that deliver great health outcomes.

Aggregating, analyzing and managing the distribution of clinical information

Managing the flow of data and alert fatigue is a real challenge that clinicians and the IT teams that support them need to understand. Clinicians need “just the facts, ma’am,” so to speak, and they need to know which set of facts pertain directly to them and the patients for whom they are caring. Receiving more than enough information is not always a good thing, especially when the situation calls for fast thinking and quick decisions.

Investments made in technologies implemented over the past several years have enabled healthcare as an industry to generate very large amounts of digitized clinical information. The challenge is to aggregate this patient data in real time to generate new knowledge about a patient and distribute it in a way that does not inundate the clinician recipients with unnecessary information. Physicians and nurses should receive information they need in order to act in that moment. Everything else is noise.


Learn how a care team communication solution can enable your clinical integration strategy. Get a demo.


Implementing communication-driven workflows

Once new knowledge is made available and deemed relevant to a given clinical situation, it’s important to enable workflows that drive this information to the right care team members, who can take action in that moment. Hospital-based communication workflows must encompass all modalities, adhere to strict security mandates and facilitate reliable exchanges among clinicians across boundaries (e.g., acute, pre-acute and post-acute care settings). This kind of clinical integration is the future of healthcare communications.

If clinicians are inundated with unnecessary information, messages and alerts, combined with a communication workflow that creates barriers to a) finding the right care team member to contact, b) finding the contact method that the clinician prefers and c) knowing whether the intended recipient received the message, the workflow is flawed and is inhibiting the decision-making that leads to higher standards of patient care.

Leveraging clinical expertise

The personal judgment of experienced healthcare professionals is irreplaceable in effective, real-time decision-making. Technological advances are no doubt improving healthcare, but human intuition can never be replaced by a new device or software. However, that intuition can be inhibited by technologies if they are not strategically implemented and managed. In this sense, real-time healthcare could, ironically, be eroding quality.

To truly leverage the hundreds of collective years of clinical expertise housed in the minds of your hospital’s medical staff—the expertise that yields great outcomes—you must remove the barriers to effective communication. Collecting patient data in real time is an important part of that. But analyzing and aggregating that data into digestible, valuable pieces of information that can be easily shared and collaborated on is the follow-through that is often overlooked.

The gravitation toward instant gratification isn’t going away. And it’s important to understand that the concept doesn’t apply simply to generating patient data as healthcare events are occurring, but also to the ability to extract the significant portions and begin collaborating with the broader care team to interpret the data and derive a plan to deliver high-value care.

How to increase the impact of smart mobile devices

Post originally published on HIT Think from Health Data Management.

For the usage of smart mobile devices to make a real impact on clinical care, hospitals and health systems must extend their concept of enterprise mobile communications to a holistic strategy—one that evolves around the end user, workflow, data, applications and other factors.

Tough challenges lie ahead for IT departments tasked with refining their enterprise mobile device strategy to grow with future needs.

Here are 10 “tried and true” recommendations to support greater levels of mobility, care team adoption and efficiency, and patient care.

1. Request the certified communications/smart device list from your electronic health record vendor. Most EHR vendors can provide this as a starting point to build or refine your enterprise mobile device strategy. The list ideally ranks the computing power of the device and its ability to access clinical data within the EHR.

2. Understand the market for shared mobile smart devices in the acute care setting. This market is in its infancy, with less than 10 percent of U.S. health systems having deployed shared mobile smart devices in their patient care settings. Be aware that many devices designed for healthcare are first-version releases and will rapidly evolve pending real-world clinical experience.

Two challenges commonly experienced by early adopters include learning to operationally deploy and manage devices exclusive of evidenced-based best practices and proven tools; and discovering that your expensive device investment is unexpectedly outdated and financially unfeasible due to the rapid technology evolution.

3. Compare iOS-based devices to Android-based devices. Key differences exist between the iOS and Android device landscapes. Apple’s iOS devices are consumer devices, whereas some Android devices are built purposely to support healthcare and other rugged environments. Notable differences are also found between consumer-grade and enterprise-grade devices.

4. Review devices that include VoIP phone capabilities. Ascom, Motorola and Spectralink are three such manufacturers.

5. Explore adding VoIP capabilities to a smart device lacking native VoIP support. Some ruggedized device manufacturers do not include native VoIP phone capability, including the Caterpillar CAT s50c and Honeywell Dolphin CT50H. VoIP phone capabilities can be added to devices by using an app offering “softphone” capabilities.

6. Consider the product lifecycle of a smart device. Purchasing a device in the first half of its lifecycle enables an organization to maximize its usefulness and longevity. For instance, if a device is in its fourth year of a five-year product lifecycle, the device most likely has a processor architecture that is four years old. In its second year of use, that processor architecture will be more than six years old. This may result in care team users decrying the devices are slow to use—especially as more apps are added through the years. Before making a significant investment in an older processor, research the timing of the next release.

7. Examine the performance of the device roaming across wireless access points. Most healthcare organizations have a high volume of wireless access points situated across multiple facilities. As a result, a device’s usability and performance in managing patient handoffs between access points is influenced significantly. To prevent problems, providers can question the device manufacturer for details on the work completed to ensure frequent access point transfers do not disrupt care operations. For example, find out how often device access points are checked for changes, as infrequent device polls increase the probability of certain access points being no longer in range. Likewise, count the number of access points in a 15-second walk in the facility.

8. Understand the difference between Android apps in the Google Play Store and Android devices. Several device manufacturers have modified their operating systems such that some functionality has been removed. Both the Motorola MC40 and the Ascom Myco, for example, offer custom versions of Android that no longer support the Google Play Store or Google Cloud Messaging capabilities. Thereby, apps leveraging push notifications can fail to work unless the app developer adds those capabilities. Question those differences, including the device’s Android consumer version.

9. Determine if your Android device choice supports Android for Work. Android for Work is a new enterprise program enabling consistent IT management and secure app distribution through an ecosystem of MDM vendors. It provides IT with a unified way to secure enterprise apps, manage disparate devices, and separate work and personal data at the OS level. Android for Work is the industry standard for app vendors providing capabilities to leverage a facility’s MDM and requires the Android device to be version 5.x or greater. For those device versions 4.x or less, the app installation and subsequent future upgrades must be completed manually.

Manufacturers that develop Android devices built purposely for commercial settings have a device lifecycle that better aligns with health enterprise expectations as opposed to consumer expectations. Consequently, while most consumer Android devices in use are version 6.x, the healthcare purpose-built devices are typically 4.x.

10. Make a well-researched device choice. Providers do not have to choose a single smart mobile device for enterprise-wide adoption among all care team members. In making your device selection decision, consider the care team member’s role and respective needs such as workflow. For example, deploying a device featuring VoIP phone capabilities for nurses—and other direct care personnel—may make more sense for accommodating workflow, as does selecting a less expensive device without VoIP capability for clinical support service staff.

Mobile charge capture: A simple change to your business practices with significant outcomes

While there are conflicting perspectives on the physician shortage, there is resolute agreement that the demand for primary and specialty care is growing due to the expanding older population. Concurrently, the challenges for physician practices, which are needed to provide that care, are also increasing. Older patients require 2–3 times the amount of specialty and primary care to treat and manage chronic conditions and age-related illnesses. Unfortunately, in today’s ever-changing healthcare environment, many practices are struggling to survive.

As has never been experienced previously, practices are facing daunting obstacles to care delivery due to rising operating costs, regulatory burdens and barriers to receiving pay/reimbursement. The cost to operate a practice has increased at twice the rate as the consumer index due to increasing rent, malpractice insurance, liability coverage, health insurance and personnel expenses. Mounting regulatory requirements have not only served to increase overhead, but have also consumed valuable patient care time with oppressive documentation and administrative requirements for HIPAA, Meaningful Use, prior authorization and quality mandates.

Now in the wake of the time-consuming and costly protracted transition to ICD-10 and EHR implementation, physicians are struggling to get paid. In part, this is due to the ACA which has introduced reimbursement cuts and increased penalties. Last year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) began to apply the value-based payment modifier to adjust reimbursement amounts to reflect the quality and cost of care provided. Those practices not meeting performance standards will receive less reimbursement. In addition, this year, the penalty for non-participation in the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) increased to a 2% reduction in the CMS market basket update. Further, the increased number of patients with insurance provided through state exchanges or the Federal marketplace has exacerbated the payment problem. These patients typically have very high deductibles, along with a 90-day window to pay premiums, posing more obstacles to the collection of co-pays and out-of-pocket expenses. Notoriously, it should be noted that the CMS also takes longer to reimburse physicians as compared to private payers. Moreover, the ICD-10 transition has resulted in increased claims denials, resulting in labor-intensive, time-consuming efforts to overturn the same.

Confronted with these challenges, paradoxically, many physicians have had to reduce the number of patients they see, further eroding financial return. However, for those struggling practices, indiscriminate cost slashing is not the answer as physicians must finely balance improved operational efficiency with the achievement of the aims of quality patient care. This is where innovative technology can play a key role. Smart investment needs to target technology that is able to:

  • Reduce operational expenses
  • Ease regulatory compliance and the documentation demand
  • Facilitate physician workflow
  • Increase patient care time
  • Generate more revenue

One such technology that meets the above criteria is mobile charge capture functionality within a secure messaging application. This would enable physicians to quickly and easily capture charges at the point of care and automatically and securely communicate this information to billing staff or a billing application.

To ensure there is no increased burden to physicians, this process must only take a couple “clicks” or a matter of seconds. For example, the application must have immediate accessible “favorite” codes composed of those services and diagnoses used most frequently and denoted by the terms most familiar to that particular practice, rather than formal codes and code definitions. Additionally, when needing to find a rarely used code not contained within favorites, the application should provide decision-support enabling the easy selection of the right ICD-10 code to be associated with the CPT code. Also, there should be code bundles available so multiple code combinations can be assigned to a patient in a single click.

This prompt and speedy process replaces the manual paper-and-pencil method in which physicians retrospectively attempt to make a note of the procedures performed —sometimes days or even weeks after the encounter. Consequently, quite often, not all services that were provided are recalled. These “notes” were then provided to the practice billing team who then must interpret the right procedure and identify the correct codes for billing purposes. Often because of the lack of detail within the notes, the specific details of the procedure are lost, reducing the amount of reimbursement received on top of the lost charges due to poor memory.

These issues could be virtually eliminated with smart mobile charge capture functionality. Additionally, this functionality enables the ability to easily add and document PQRS codes while facilitating patient rounding, with a customized patient list and direct access to previous charges, and with the ability to rapidly “clone” them for the day’s visit. This information would also be visible across the entire group of physicians, if desired.

By automating and expediting the charge capture process, there is a direct impact on the practice’s financial homeostasis:

  • The elimination of lost charges and improved coding specificity directly translates into higher revenue.
  • The coding decision support and the inability to mismatch CPT and ICD-10 codes mean reduced potential for costly and time-consuming audits and claims denials.
  • The easy documentation of PQRS avoids the 2% CMS penalty and facilitates compliance.
  • The immediate transmission of charges to billing staff speeds the time to billing, reducing the amount of time to payment received.
  • The number of FTEs required to support the coding and billing process can be dramatically reduced markedly decreasing operational expenses.

Most importantly, such technology can allow physicians to spend more time doing what they want to do and what we need them to do—caring for and treating patients.

3 “must-haves” for simplifying complex clinical communications

Part 3 of a 3-part series in conjunction with our nurse leadership webinar series.

Imagine a world where you launch the EMR, review a patient’s chart, and want to discuss it with the covering cardiologist that day. You click a link for the cardiologist within the EMR and it references that provider’s group workflow processes, reviews their schedules and monitors their momentary status to direct you to the correct provider. Then you type your message. The patient’s information is pulled from the EMR and is securely routed to the recipient based on their contact preference in that moment. It can happen – but this is not the norm in most healthcare facilities today.

Practicing medicine today is complex – clinicians need to consider an ever-changing landscape, federal and state regulations, not to mention the many different innovations designed to help streamline everything from care delivery to reimbursement. Adding to the complexity are the many different providers treating patients, working across various care settings with large care teams.

Given the vastness of these care networks, it can be daunting – albeit necessary – to coordinate care. One way to help connect clinicians in all care settings and improve care team collaboration is through a comprehensive communication solution.

It’s important to first understand why clinical communication is complex and why many of the technologies implemented today aren’t solving the issues clinicians are facing. Factors such as the patient’s reason for contact, the physician’s location, team coverage, degree of urgency and unassigned ER calls all impact the communication process.

Looking across varied care settings, people, processes and preferences also differ. Between inpatient and outpatient facilities, medical group practices and post-acute care, there are many variations in care team communication strategies and approaches that make it prone to gaps and breakdowns. In fact, one of the most frustrating parts of a nurse’s job is the daily battle to determine the correct covering provider.

In this complex environment with so many participants, the continuum of patient care demands that communication solutions span much further than the four walls of a hospital or practice. And as healthcare delivery models change, it’s imperative that care coordination, and the communication that drives it, be streamlined and efficient across all of these settings. When looking for a platform to simplify clinical communication, healthcare organizations should keep the following three “must have” capabilities in mind:

  • Span the entire care continuum: A comprehensive solution must address the needs of all care team members across all types of settings – from a single hospital to a multi-site system, as well as outpatient practices and care settings. They all have different demands and communication requirements. For example, larger practices and hospitals need advanced directory capabilities to bring the opportunity to coordinate care based on facility, group or ACOs, with the appropriate workflow processes built in. In addition, the solution should have the ability to generate real-time patient updates – such as when the patient presents to the emergency department, is discharged home, or when important results are available. This is essential to timely coordination of care. Finally, it’s imperative that the communication solution connect to the organization’s other HIT systems to maintain integration for alarms and alerts, such as if stroke team is activated. It’s critical that covering providers respond quickly and that a back-up process is in place.
  • Provide a standardized, yet flexible way to communicate: Clinicians should have flexible, yet standardized communication options that allow their messages to be routed appropriately and securely, and account for today’s technology. Gone are the days of referencing binders, faxed schedules or notes taped to the wall or desk. Once the communication process is initiated, the process should seamlessly connect you with the correct covering provider for the clinical situation at hand – whether through call, text or via a mobile app.
  • Address process complexities with intelligent routing: Schedules, workgroup rules, team mobilization requirements and escalation paths should all be configured so that you are connected to the right care team member with real-time accuracy. A solution with dynamic intelligent routing is able to deliver messages at the right time, to the right person in any given clinical situation. Clinicians should be able to customize based on their device and delivery preferences, and make changes based on their activity (e.g., what to do with a call while in the OR).

The goal is simple: Remove the variability, the hand offs and the touch points that introduce risk and opportunities for communication breakdowns. Initiate the communication in the manner you wish, and let the process connect you to the correct covering provider for your clinical situation at any moment in time.

While efficient clinical communication is a challenge, the right solution can lead to tremendous benefits for every care team member, as well as the organization. The solution must be comprehensive, providing standardization and the ability to streamline the communications process. By implementing technology that addresses these three areas, healthcare organizations will not only be able to improve clinical communication, but will ultimately improve the experience for patients, and the extended care team.


Interested in learning more? Read part 1 and part 2 of this series on nurse leadership in care team collaboration.

Building an effective care team collaboration strategy: 4 focal points

Part 2 of a 3-part series in conjunction with our nurse leadership webinar series.

The need to unify physicians, nurses and other care team members through effective communication at the point of care is growing in significance. According to a 2015 Gartner report, 80 percent of providers report deploying fragmented communication technologies, which results in degraded care team communication and collaboration.

Collaboration is both a process and an outcome. It affects the patient experience, outcomes and care occurring across a variety of settings in an increasingly complex and mobile environment.

To resolve the fragmented and non-secure communication encountered in healthcare, true care team collaboration is dependent on consolidating disparate technologies into a single solution capable of directly addressing the communication obstacles degrading patient care today.

To some, this may sound like an unachievable goal, but with a strategic plan focused in areas that facilitate workflow processes and communication leading to improved patient care, it is attainable.

You may wonder, where do I even begin? Many organizations, in response to specific challenges, have deployed single-point technologies that provide only incremental gains. True communication and collaboration requires a comprehensive strategy, and to begin you must carefully evaluate your entire communication landscape. You’ll need to assess your current technologies, HIPAA compliance plan, near miss or sentinel event occurrences, nursing time to reach providers and consult notifications procedures – all of which will highlight your communication strengths and weaknesses.

Developing a comprehensive care team collaboration strategy spans four major areas of consideration. Failure to address any one of these areas may leave you with an incomplete solution. Each organization is unique, certainly, but departments and organizations must work together to create an environment ripe for collaboration.

  • Clinical – Mobile technologies are becoming more prevalent in healthcare settings, thus the need to leverage these technologies to facilitate secure communication amongst the care team is becoming increasingly important. A clinical communications solution should enable communication-driven workflows to facilitate timely care team communication. The solution should facilitate direct conversations among nurses and physicians via the preferred mode of contact – be it a mobile phone, pager, email or office land line. By triaging incoming calls and applying personalized algorithms for call placement, care team members reach the correct physician without searching through call schedules.
  • Operational – Once your plan is in place, bringing it to life warrants consideration and considerable forethought. A well-defined adoption strategy will be key to a successful implementation. Clinical champions help drive decisions and engage end users. Leadership engagement is often the most essential driver of adoption of any initiative, plan or policy. You should also consider and plan around timelines, specific tasks and resource requirements.
  • Technical – To achieve success, understanding and addressing technical infrastructure is a must. The strength of your Wi-Fi and cellular networks should be evaluated. Does your organization have a device strategy or do you have a BYOD policy? Do you desire integration with clinical systems and is the solution you are considering interoperable?
  • Financial – In any financial consideration, ultimate ROI and total cost of ownership are needed to justify approaches. When you close communication gaps across the extended care team to facilitate patient care collaboration, you can potentially improve referral revenue, decrease readmissions and avoid penalty costs. The ability to do mobile charge capture at the bedside, and to quickly and fully document exam and procedure details at the point of care will result in revenue recognition and improved cash flow for physicians.

There is no short list of considerations when it comes to building an effective care team collaboration strategy. However, if you focus on these four areas, gain support of leadership and identify a solution that hits these marks, you will be well on your way to effectively addressing your communication and collaboration needs.


Interested in learning more? Read part 1 and part 3 of this series on nurse leadership in care team collaboration.

Nurses need innovative care team collaboration technology

Part 1 of a 3-part series in conjunction with our nurse leadership webinar series.

Six years ago, the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), formerly the Institute of Medicine (IOM), recommended that nurses lead inter-professional collaboration and healthcare delivery improvement and redesign. They noted that nurses are uniquely positioned to do this since, given the care setting, they are quite often the primary patient caregiver. As such, they serve as the virtual linchpin of care—connecting the various care providing professions while coordinating patient care across the entire care team. Toward that end, nurses are responsible for over 90% of physician communications while directing over 80% of their own communications to the broader care team.

While some inroads have been made in regard to this IOM recommendation, there are formidable challenges impeding significant progress. As the industry transitions to value-based-care, nurses are being held increasingly more accountable for patient outcomes and experience. Paradoxically, they are concurrently being asked to perform more indirect and non-patient-care tasks which reduce the amount of time at the patient bedside—one of the strongest predictors of positive patient outcomes and experience.

One such activity is care team communication.

Specifically, nurses have reported that difficulty communicating with the care team has decreased direct patient care time. One survey study found that 75% of nurse respondents reported wasting valuable care time just attempting to communicate with physicians and other care team members. In part, as 50% of the respondents acknowledged, this is because they are unaware of the right care team member to contact for the clinical situation at hand. The latter explains why the majority of physicians reported being frequently erroneously contacted when not the right physician for the situation.

These recalcitrant obstacles to care team communication and collaboration have served to delay patient care and prolong patient wait times. No one is more acutely aware of this than the nurse.

Nurses quite often find themselves waiting for physicians to return phone calls/pages while their patient needlessly suffers. As the nurse struggles to coordinate care, no one is more cognizant of the impact of missed care or delayed transitions on the patient and the patient’s family. Moreover, no one is more handicapped by the limits of fragmented communication technologies that have not successfully overcome these challenges because they only address a small component of the overall problem. And no one is in more need, than the nurse, for innovative technology that is able to immediately connect the right care team members to facilitate timely collaboration.

The good news is that this technology is now available. However, when evaluating the various care team collaboration platforms, it is important to avoid common pitfalls. Here are a few guiding principles to keep in mind:

  • While secure messaging is a salient feature of the platform, it is not wholly sufficient to address these communication obstacles since it is dependent upon two flawed assumptions.
    1. The recipient, such as the physician, must desire to be contacted at all times for all situations every day of the week.
    2. The sender, for example, the nurse, knows who to contact in every single situation.
  • All of the care team must be on the same platform. As the IOM noted, “True inter-professional collaboration can be accomplished only in concert with other health professionals, not within the nursing profession alone.” This holds true for any other profession.
  • Most importantly, the technology must be purposefully designed to overcome the known referenced obstacles. To do this, it must be able to automatically identify and provide immediate connection to the right care team member for that particular clinical situation. This type of complex logic requires that for every single communication by every care team member, the contextual variables of the particular message must be analyzed in real time to ensure the communication is routed to the correct individual.
  • The care team collaboration platform capabilities must transcend the walls of any one facility. Nurses, as well as physicians and other care team members, quite frequently need to contact team members who work in and across other facilities and locations. The platform must be able to support this communication and the intelligent routing capabilities must extend to provide immediate identification and connection to these care team members when needed.
  • Ultimately, the care team collaboration platform must have proven functionality to reduce communication cycle times. Reducing the time to connect and close the communication loop translates into care team efficiency and increased patient care time. As every nurse knows, this means speed to treatment, improved patient experience and improved patient outcomes.

Nurses are indeed perfectly positioned to lead inter-professional collaboration and healthcare delivery improvement. However, it is critical that they are provided with the technology that will allow them to overcome all the challenges this entails.

Let us not repeat the mistakes of the past—providing nurses with inadequate technology in response to which, they must find a work around—increasing their effort and workload in the endeavor. Quite sincerely, healthcare improvement and reform depends on it.


Interested in learning more? Read part 2 and part 3 of this series on nurse leadership in care team collaboration.